Thursday, January 28, 2016

The Missing Message



            While reading The Road, I could not help but notice how unique McCarthy’s style of writing is. Namely, several key aspects of a typical novel are missing. With the absence of chapters, character names, and the sparse use of punctuation, one may question: is this just Cormac McCarthy’s unusual style of writing or are there some underlying messages behind it?
            Starting with the absence of character names, McCarthy may have done this to keep the story relatable. By calling the characters "The Boy" and "The Man" they are universal, allowing any reader to relate to the story. This is important because many readers may believe that an apocalypse, or something similar, is unlikely. The universality draws the reader in, allowing them to picture the hardships the survivors are forced to face. Ironically, commercial products, such as Coca Cola, are named. This further adds to the hardships, acting as reminders of how life used to be. In addition, he could have done this to reinforce the theme of nothing. By not giving the reader specific characters to become attached to, he emphasizes the sad, lifeless, and hopeless setting of the novel.
            McCarthy also uses little punctuation in The Road. Perhaps this helps portray the theme of nothingness. With a story line that is bare, and deprived of almost everything, the idea of emptiness is clearly depicted.
I think McCarthy writes so sparingly so that the reader will focus on the small, simple things in the story’s otherwise terrible, pointless life. 


2 comments:

  1. Joey, I agree with many of your points but I want to focus on the fact that the characters have no names. This helps enforce that these two people could have been anyone. That the boy and father do not have any special ablilities, nor do they contribute much in the aspect of conversation. It tends to sound as if almost the boy and the father are strangers and feel somewhat unconfortable around each other. Is this due to something in the past? Maybe the death of the boys mother was more complicated then we may think. These questions are very unlikely going to be answered as the text continues. This is why we need to think for ourselves. Any other thoughts?

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete